Articles in category 'Linked data'

The planning for the Midwinter Jane-athon pre-conference has been taking up a lot of my attention lately. It’s a really cool idea (credit to Deborah Fritz) to address the desire we’ve been hearing for some time for a participatory, hands on, session on RDA. And lets be clear, we’re not talking about the RDA instructions–this […]

By Diane Hillmann, December 19, 2014, 10:22 am (UTC-5)

Many of you have heard me say “Time flies, whether you’re having fun or not”–and that has certainly been the case since I got back from the NISO Roadmap meeting a few weeks ago. Somehow, with my head down, I missed part 1 of Roy Tennant’s post “The Post-MARC Era, Part 1: “If It’s Televised, […]

By Diane Hillmann, May 14, 2013, 4:34 pm (UTC-5)

I saw the announcement a few weeks ago about the demise of MARBI and the creation of the new ALCTS/LITA Metadata Standards Committee. My first reaction was ‘uh oh,’ and I flashed back to the beginnings of the DCMI Usage Board. The DCUB still exists, but in a sort of limbo, as DCMI reorganizes itself […]

By Diane Hillmann, October 26, 2012, 11:01 am (UTC-5)

Metadata is produced and stored locally, published globally, consumed and aggregated locally, and finally integrated and stored locally. This is the create/publish/consume/integrate cycle. Providing a framework for managing metadata throughout this cycle is the goal of the Dublin Core Abstract Model and the Dublin Core Application Profile (DCAM/DCAP). The basic guidelines and requirements for this […]

By Jon, July 19, 2012, 11:54 am (UTC-5)

By-passing taggregations identifies those MARC21 variable data field tags whose level 0 RDF properties, representing individual subfields, can be used generally in data triples and mapping triples without losing information and the semantic coherency of the record. These tags have subfields which are independent of one another, with no need to keep them together if […]

By Gordon Dunsire, July 18, 2012, 9:44 am (UTC-5)

If we were asked (as we sometimes are) what we’d like to see develop as a result of the BibFrame effort, the emphasis in our answer would have both technical and social aspects. First, given the technologies developing in several different places and considering what we can do now to bring Linked Open Data into […]

By Diane Hillmann, July 4, 2012, 2:35 pm (UTC-5)

The methodology of treating MARC21 variable data field tags as aggregated statements in RDF is discussed in Taggregations. There are some circumstances when this approach is redundant and level 0 RDF properties based on individual subfields can be used directly in MARC21 data triples that are semantically complete and coherent, and in mapping triples relating […]

By Gordon Dunsire, June 7, 2012, 8:20 am (UTC-5)

The technique described in Using the sub-property ladder works well to “dumb-up” raw, level 0 data from MARC21 fixed-length data fields to interoperate with metadata from other schemas. Unfortunately, it cannot be used with most MARC21 variable data fields (tags) and subfields. We cannot simply dumb-up a subfield to the level of its parent tag […]

By Gordon Dunsire, May 20, 2012, 5:08 pm (UTC-5)

I discussed the utility of the sub-property relationship in Getting to higher MARC branches, Netting more MARC fruit, and Adding MARC fruit to the cornucopia. Coincidentally, Bob DuCharme posted Simple federated queries with RDF which outlines the same technique and provides additional information on its use for resource discovery. Those posts are somewhat technical, and […]

By Gordon Dunsire, May 12, 2012, 1:17 pm (UTC-5)

Why create “a separate property for every combination of tag, two indicators, and subfield”, as I mentioned in Low-hanging MARC fruit? As Karen says in her comment on Getting to higher MARC branches, in the case of the Target audience data element there is no need for the RDF properties defined for each MARC21 “resource […]

By Gordon Dunsire, April 30, 2012, 3:37 am (UTC-5)